This Xconomy article by Wade Roush does a great job of telling the AngelList and Venture Hacks story:

In Seed Funding Race, AngelList Sorts the “Junk” from the “Maybes”

I hesitated to link to it because these articles always make you look more handsome than you really are. But Wade does a great job of rounding up the state of the art of angel investing and placing AngelList in that context. Here’s a choice quote:

“I think the way to get into angel investing is, first, you obviously have to have money; you have to have a brand, otherwise you are not going to be differentiated and you are not going to see good deals; and you have to have a network of angels to work with, so you can move in packs and find other people to help you with due diligence,” Ravikant says.

It’s only then that AngelList can help. “The final thing is that you need to have good deal flow, so that you can see when the good things come along,” Ravikant says. “We will bring you deal flow, make it easy to syndicate deals, and we’ll show you deals that hopefully over time matches up to your interests.”

Check out the rest of the thoughtful article.

Quora is a Q&A site. We were planning on posting a question asking startups and angels to share their AngelList experience. But someone beat us to it:

What do people think of AngelList?

I can’t think of a better piece of marketing than this thread. There’s nothing we could say better. I want to replace the AngelList homepage with this thread.

Quora spam

Quora’s goal is “to have each question page become the best possible resource for someone who wants to know about the question.”

The Quora community will kill you if you fill it with rubbish. You have to have a lot of very happy users to try Quora marketing. And you have to expect negative reviews too. Quora’s looking for the best answer — not your answer.

Hating Quora

I’ve resisted Quora since they were in closed beta. Partly because everyone was raving about it. Partly because I thought the user experience was insane.

Now I’m hooked. And I think they’ve created a new class of user experience.  It’s a “go with the flow” experience. Don’t try to load a model of the site in your head — it’s too complicated and they’re constantly redesigning it. Just expect things to be there when you need them. And expect that you can do a lot with each piece of data on the site (suggest revisions, revise it, revert it, vote on it, eat it, thank the author…).

Quora’s a lot like The Wire, you’ll hate the first 5 episodes — then something will happen in your head and you won’t be able to shut up about it. Follow me and Naval on Quora and check out the AngelList thread already.

Last week, Naval and a slew of angels shared their investing advice with an audience of angels-in-training at AngelConf 2010.

Wade Roush at Xconomy took detailed notes on all the talks and published them here and here.

7 angel investing tips

Here are Wade’s detailed notes from Naval’s talk:

“1. Don’t move in a herd, but do be a pack animal. Not everybody has all the information. One angle might know the market, one might know the founder, one might know the customer base. Every time an angel comes into a round, they bring a piece of information. Ride on their coattails.

2. Say no early and often. You should be doing one deal for every 20 to 30 that you see. If you do more than that, you’re overinvesting.

3. You need to have a brand. The really great deals are obvious, and everybody wants in, and if you want to get in you need a brand. That could be that you have been successful with great companies in the past. And building a brand does not mean taking coffee meetings. Shallow connections do not mean much. If you have a fancy office on Sand Hill Road or Market Street, the best deals are not going to come to you. If you’re not out there running around getting to know people, then you are really just practicing the VC model.

4. Humility. When you’re sitting there all day and people are asking for money and more often than not you are saying no, it eventually goes to your head. The problem is that when a Mark Zuckerberg walks in, those guys have more offers than they have room for. If you come across as arrogant, they will drop you.

5. Your job is to be a little dispassionate. Don’t try to run the company. Don’t even take the power—if you don’t have it, you won’t be tempted to use it.

6. Filters. Every winner is unique by definition, because what they’re doing is new. But the losers tend to cluster around common mistakes, such as investing in a company with one founder. You will find you can establish filters, even one as simple as “Do what you love.”

7. There are many paths to success. You have to be very careful about taking your limited experience and trying to shoehorn your companies into it.”

I use Twitter favorites to keep track of AngelList testimonials. I just favorite the testimonials I like. It’s super easy:

And it’s trivial to embed them anywhere:

Widget: AngelList Favorites

Not every testimonial is a tweet

You can track a non-tweet testimonial by linking to it on Twitter and then favoriting it. Or by bookmarking it on del.icio.us — I use the testimonial tag.

If you go to my testimonial tag on del.icio.us, you’ll see I’ve also bookmarked private Gmail conversations. Gmail lets you link to threads — although you have to be logged in to see them.

I pull up these testimonials when I’m telling people about AngelList. There’s a story behind each tweet and it’s a fun way to start the conversation.

Paul Graham says “The future [of funding] is no fixed amount, no fixed closing date, and no lead.” In other words, the future of financing is continuous, not discrete.

This post explains how to raise a seed round with no lead, no fixed amount, and a fluid closing date. The process is called mass syndication, or a party round.

Paul proposes eliminating rounds altogether, but we’re not there yet. Mass syndication is a single continuous seed round and I think it’s the state of the art in continuous fundraising.

We originally offered this interview exclusively to AngelList applicants — now it’s available to everyone.

Another future

The future of funding is also finding the right investors for your startup, quickly. Not just picking from the investors you can get introductions to.

How? You want to get instant meetings with any investor you want. And you only want to meet investors who are genuinely interested in your startup. That’s what AngelList is for. One danger of this approach is that your round is oversubscribed.

Despite the name, you can use AngelList to request intros to any subset of investors on the list — you don’t need to send it to the whole list.

Leads aren’t going away

Fred Wilson writes “If you don’t want a lead investor, then don’t knock on my door because I don’t know any other way to be.”

This interview explains how to raise a seed round with the conservative assumption that a lead won’t step forward — but it doesn’t preclude you from changing course if a lead appears.

1. Interview

Video: Interview with chapters (for iPod, iPhone, iTunes)
Audio: Interview without chapters (MP3, works anywhere)
Transcript: Below

2. Outline

Here’s an outline and transcript:

  1. You can close an angel round with ‘mass syndication’
  2. Start with terms and valuation below market
  3. What you want in your term sheet
  4. What you don’t want in your term sheet
  5. Should you have a board seat for seed investors?
  6. This isn’t comprehensive term sheet advice
  7. Memorize the term sheet before your first meeting
  8. How do you set your valuation? Price it to move
  9. How do you bring up the terms in a meeting?
  10. Describe how the terms are investor-friendly
  11. A preferred round is a good way to set up good initial terms
  12. Does a small seed round need protective provisions? Pros and cons.
  13. Get feedback on the terms in the first meeting
  14. Drop names to build social proof
  15. Social proof works differently in a Series A round with VCs
  16. See if the “interest” includes a dollar amount, intros, and name-dropping (a.k.a. soft circled)
  17. When do you need a lead?
  18. Approach the financing as if you won’t find a lead
  19. What’s a lead investor?
  20. If they say “find a lead,” ask why
  21. How to create a deadline
  22. Raise the money when you don’t need it
  23. Send two emails to the angels
  24. Do a rolling close: the cash comes in just- in-time
  25. Mass syndication can fail if a very high social proof investor drops out
  26. Use AngelList and StartupList to get intros to angels
  27. What do angels look for?
  28. Advisors are good for getting your foot in the door, not in a pitch
  29. Get advisors by going to events or talking to entrepreneurs
  30. Before you raise a seed round, you need a product in the marketplace
  31. Use customer development and lean startup techniques to get to market with less
  32. Pitching hacks free chapter: Advice on getting investor intros
  33. If you need money to get something in the marketplace, pitch idea investors
  34. Pitch incubators or do your startup on the side
  35. What are the different types of seed stage investors?
  36. If you’re talking to a VC, make sure they really do seed stage rounds
  37. Potential concerns with pitching multi-stage and seed-stage firms
  38. Get intros to seed investors with AngelList/StartupList

3. Transcript

Music: Squarepusher

Nivi: Hi there, this is Nivi from Venture Hacks.

Naval: And Naval from Venture Hacks.

Nivi: And we’re going to talk about how to close an angel round, how to put together an angel round, or in other words, how to herd a motley crew of angel investors and turn those meetings that you’re getting into money in the bank.

I think we’re going to start off by talking about mass syndication, which is an approach that I think more entrepreneurs should be taking to close their angel rounds.

You can close an angel round with ‘mass syndication’

Nivi: I think entrepreneurs make two typical mistakes when they’re doing an angel round, and they come from what they’ve read online about how to close a VC round. So, there are two things.

One: they don’t name drop enough. They don’t mention who else is interested.

Two: and I guess more importantly, they’re looking for a lead, which you don’t necessarily need in an angel round.

When you put those two together and combine them with a term sheet that you essentially write yourself, you’ve got a new way to close an angel round which we call mass syndication, which I’ve done personally. And Naval, maybe you can talk about how often you see that happening, or if you don’t see that happening, or whatever.

Naval: It happens fairly often these days. Especially the Y Combinator companies, which are well trained by Paul Graham and crew, will exercise mass syndication a lot. So, they take the standard term sheet that they’ve been given and they go out and do a rolling close of various convertible notes. And it generally works pretty well.

The keys are that you have to set the terms and the valuation very, very reasonably. In fact, you have to probably price slightly below market, because otherwise the angels don’t trust you, then they want a lead who’s done the due diligence. You have to work with people that you have warm intros with, you have to name drop like crazy, and you have to create forcing functions to get the round to close. You can’t give people all the time in the world.
[Read more →]

Today we’re announcing that LearnBoost has raised money with AngelList.  LearnBoost makes an “easy-to-use online gradebook for teachers.”

LearnBoost was referred to us by two-time Power Broker Harper Reed. They used AngelList to contact George Zachary and Jeff Fagnan who invested:

George Zachary (Investor in Twitter)
Jeff Fagnan (Investor in Songbird)

George then introduced LearnBoost to AngelList members Bill Lee, James Hong, and Othman Laraki who also invested:

Bill Lee (Investor in Tesla Motors)
James Hong (Investor in Slide)
Othman Laraki (Founder of Mixer Labs)

Finally, here’s a few of the investors who sourced LearnBoost without AngelList and invested:

RRE (Investor in Venmo)
Bessemer (Investor in Postini)

Update: Read more about LearnBoost’s fundraising experience on the LearnBoost blog.

About LearnBoost

What is LearnBoost? In their own words,

“Our Teacher Gradebook is the best gradebook software on the web.

“Beautiful design and wonderful user experience makes you wonder why you’ve been using other gradebooks. Plus we’re free. Your new found productivity means you can spend more time doing what you do best: teach.”

Update 2: Learn more about LearnBoost in this detailed Xconomy profile: LearnBoost Bets on Better Tools for Teachers.

Startups: Get intros to AngelList here.
Angels: Join AngelList here.
Everyone: Get AngelList updates via Twitter and RSS.

Today we’re announcing that Thumbtack has raised money with AngelList.  Thumbtack is “your marketplace for local services.”

Thumbtack got their first commitments at Open Angel Forum, from Joshua Schachter, Cyan & Scott Banister, and Jason Calacanis. Then they used AngelList to contact Ariel Poler and Auren Hoffman who invested:

Ariel Poler (Investor in AdMob)
Auren Hoffman (Investor in Aardvark)

Thumbtack’s CEO, Marco Zappacosta, sent me this very nice email about his AngelList experience:

“Both Ariel Poler and Auren Hoffman came from AngelList. And Auren introduced me to Scott Fabor and Mark Britto who are also now investing. Joshua Schachter & Jason Calacanis are also on the list but I was first introduced to them through Jason’s Open Angel Forum.

“The value of AngelList goes beyond the money, though — the introductions have been killer, even when they didn’t net a check. I got to meet with Keith Rabois, Bryan SchreierFloodgate, First Round, Jeremy Levine, and others: relationships that I would not have been able to initiate without you guys.”

Read more about Marco’s fundraising experience on the Thumbtack blog.

About Thumbtack

What is Thumbtack? In their own words,

“Why can you go online right now and buy any product you want but you can’t do the same for tutors, handymen, dog walkers, or other local services? Thumbtack is changing that.

“Thumbtack isn’t like typical local search directories that simply return business listings with ratings and reviews, leaving you no better off than the paper Yellow Pages.

“Instead, Thumbtack gives you the ability to vet, contact and book service professionals the moment you find them.”


Sounds like a service I need to try.

Startups: Get intros to AngelList here.
Angels: Join AngelList here.
Everyone: Get AngelList updates via Twitter and RSS.

Fred Wilson reviews AngelList:

“…The old model of angel deals is alive and well. Angels love to share deals with each other. It is how angel rounds come together. But AngelList adds at least two things to the mix. First, it adds a place where the deals can come together online. And second it adds people to the mix that would not be part of the offline deal sharing networks that already exist.

“I am on AngelList. I see all the deals come together. I don’t personally invest in angel deals in the web/tech space because of potential conflict with USV down the road. But even so, I find it immensely useful to see what companies are getting traction in the angel market. It’s part of my radar/early warning system. And it is entirely possible that we will decide that USV needs to participate in an angel round that is coming together on AngelList, although that has not yet happened.

So if you are putting together an angel round, particularly if you already have it partially raised but need to finish it off, I strongly suggest looking into AngelList. It’s a great service.”

[Emphasis added.]

Fred describes our value proposition better than we do. It’s not just great PR when your users blog and tweet about you — it’s also a form of customer development.

Angel investor Thomas McInerney:

“Take a look at all the innovation happening today — Tesla has produced a beautiful 100% electric car. The cost of mapping the human genome has gone from $3 billion ten years ago to thousands today. Moore’s Law continues unabated and the rate of innovation in smart phones is staggering. The computer has moved from the desktop to the pocket, this trend alone reminds me of the World Wide Web in 1994. Social networking is in its infancy, and Twitter and Facebook are growing explosively. IP traffic is growing so fast that it has stunned the pioneering people who helped create it.

Ray Kurzweil maps out an optimistic view of the future with a tremendous amount of data supporting his main thesis — that the rate of innovation is increasing on a geometric scale. This means that innovation is happening faster every day. So yes, there are macro-level concerns about the economy, but there is also a staggering amount of data that supports the case for being an optimist. The data supports the fact that we’ll see more innovation in the next ten years than we’ve seen in the last one hundred years.

“If you are an investor or entrepreneur, this is the best time in history to make a fortune and create a better world… So if you’ve run out of ideas, buy gold. But I argue this is the best time to find innovators and invest in the future. Fortune favors the bold.”

[Emphasis added.]

Read the full post. You can reach Thomas via AngelList.

If you’re a passionate entrepreneur, you can often see the vast potential for your product. In your head, the possibilities of the future branch out, with infinite forks and potential. When pitching to investors, you’ve learned to define your market as broadly as possible while remaining credible. So, it’s not surprising that you’re disappointed when investors don’t disclose a conflict, and you steer clear of investors who might already have an investment in the same space — dating, social gaming, compliance, security, etc.

If you’re an experienced investor, you’ve seen it all. How every startup thinks they can take over the world, but usually has to struggle to accomplish even its one core product or task. How three copycat business plans will arrive in the same week, and how each one thinks they’re unique and protectable. How domain knowledge and therefore your ability to help a startup accrue by having multiple investments in the same space.

Both points of view are pretty extreme, and the truths about conflicts of interest are highly contextual. Here’s how to think about it.

1. The idea

Firstly, the idea — it’s no big deal. If it’s any good, someone has had it before and someone will have it again. If you’re still convinced it’s that good, go file a patent first, and then go talk about it. Keep in mind that investors outside of big tech (cleantech, biotech…) automatically have a bias against “patented” ideas, and most brilliance seems obvious in hindsight. Ask an investor to sign an NDA, and you’ve just filtered out all but the most desperate investors.

2. The space

Secondly, the space — it’s tricky, but you have to define it as realistically narrow. There was a time when having an investment in “web” might have been considered a conflict for another “web” company. There was a time when the term “portal” was a competitive category. Unless it’s head-on competition, Foursquare v. Gowalla, Disqus v. IntenseDebate, Google v. Bing, it’s really, honestly, not competitive. If there’s room for multiple equal-sized players in the space, it’s not as competitive as you might think. Also, theories about where you might zig or zag don’t count — just compare on what you’re doing at this moment.

3. Angels vs. VCs

Thirdly, the type of investor matters — active angels have a lot more deals than active VCs and are more likely to have an investment in an adjacent space. This is not a big problem — angels invest in syndicates and usually only provide help in a contextual, on-demand way. Because VCs are likely to be on your board, have more money into the company, and have more control and information rights, it makes more sense to pay attention to conflicts VCs might have (Disclosure: I consider myself to be an angel investor).

4. Conflict checks

Fourthly, just ask the VC to disclose potential conflicts up front, but don’t be too broad-minded about what constitutes a conflict.

Lastly, beware the “entrepreneur check.” This is where the VC tells you that they like your company, want to do due-diligence, and then just have to check with the entrepreneur in one of their investments about whether this investment would be competitive or not. Since entrepreneurs tend to have an overly-broad view of what’s competitive, this check usually fails. Even in the rare case that it doesn’t, it’s used as an excuse by the investor to pass. Therefore, always insist that they run the “entrepreneur check” early in the process, before you’ve invested too much into this investor.

Your own biggest competition

Our flawed patent system aside, ideas do not have the merit that we were all raised believing. You do have to pick the right space, but after that, execution is everything. Here’s a quick confirmation test — go back to your classmates and pick out the smartest ones, and then the hardest working ones. Now look at who is successful. A certain base level of intellect and idea-formation capability is required, but beyond that are strongly diminishing or even negative returns.

Consequently, the best entrepreneurs display a lot of chutzpah. They aren’t fazed by the competition, nor do they see shadows in every corner. They are their own biggest competition.