<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Venture Hacks &#187; Investment Criteria</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturehacks.com/topics/investment-criteria/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturehacks.com</link>
	<description>Good advice for startups.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 18:02:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What do investors look for in a startup?</title>
		<link>http://venturehacks.com/articles/investment-criteria</link>
		<comments>http://venturehacks.com/articles/investment-criteria#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nivi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Investment Criteria]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturehacks.com/?p=412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few days ago, I posted a video where fellow Venture Hacker Naval Ravikant answers the age-old question: What do you look for in a startup? I liked his answer and transcribed/paraphrased it below: (Video: Interview with Naval Ravikant.) &#8220;There&#8217;s no silver bullet or magic answer but I actually do have a set of criteria [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few days ago, I posted a video where fellow Venture Hacker <a href="http://venturehacks.com/naval">Naval Ravikant</a> answers the age-old question:</p>
<blockquote><p>What do you look for in a startup?</p></blockquote>
<p>I liked his answer and transcribed/paraphrased it below:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_BwatxQwgNs&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_BwatxQwgNs&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>(Video: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_BwatxQwgNs">Interview with Naval Ravikant</a>.)</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;There&#8217;s no silver bullet or magic answer but I actually do have a set of criteria I&#8217;ve come up with based on my own startups, after looking back on what worked.</p>
<p>&#8220;I look for two things that are paramount above all:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Great team</strong>. It&#8217;s obvious. It&#8217;s a tautology. Everybody says it. You have to be working with some of the best people in the industry you&#8217;re in.</li>
<li><strong>Huge market</strong>. Niche markets just don&#8217;t work because the first idea never works. You always have to change the idea, so you need room to maneuver in a big market.</li>
</ol>
<p>&#8220;There are three more factors that I look at. Not all three of them are required but I prefer a company to have at least two of them:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Difficult technology</strong> that is compounding over time.</li>
<li><strong>A proprietary distribution channel</strong>. A clever viral marketing, or SEO, or partnership, or whatever strategy that gives them a leg up over competitors.</li>
<li><strong>A direct monetization model</strong>. Something more than throwing up 10 cent banner ad CPMs.</li>
</ol>
<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s a small number of companies that are very good and very qualified and they get an embarrassingly large number of offers. And there&#8217;s a large number of companies that miss on one or two of these dimensions and they pound the fund-raising pavement and don&#8217;t get anything.</p>
<p>&#8220;This makes sense when you think about it because this is a hit-driven business: a small number of companies account for all the returns. So when people recognize what they think is a winning company, they will pay almost anything and they will do almost anything to invest in that company. And when they look at what they think is a non-winning company, they just say &#8220;bye&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s very similar to Hollywood where there are a few blockbusters and a lot of indie films made. Everyone&#8217;s got a camera but odds are you have an indie film. So go back to these five criteria and think about your blockbuster.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>My criteria are a little different. Yes, you need a great team in a big market (preferably, the team has years of experience with their customer).</p>
<p>The only other thing I look for is an amazing product. What makes a product amazing? You know it when you see it. The founders must be chasing a big vision with a beautiful product that is going to make a dent in the universe.</p>
<p>A great product automatically satisifies the technology, distribution, and monetization criteria. Great products are always hard to build. Grafting distribution onto something that isn&#8217;t great is a band-aid and a waste of time. It might work, but who wants to spend their lives doing it? Finally, a great product in a big market will either make a lot of money or <a href="http://redeye.firstround.com/2006/04/shrink_a_market.html">shrink the market</a>.</p>
<p>Knowing these criteria is one thing. Applying them effectively is another; I hope to learn how someday. It takes practice, diversification, and an aesthetic sensibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://venturehacks.com/articles/investment-criteria/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

