<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to close a term sheet quickly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturehacks.com/articles/closing-quickly/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturehacks.com/articles/closing-quickly</link>
	<description>Good advice for startups.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:11:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: scott edward walker</title>
		<link>http://venturehacks.com/articles/closing-quickly/comment-page-1#comment-10871</link>
		<dc:creator>scott edward walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturehacks.com/?p=1355#comment-10871</guid>
		<description>Nivi -- Excellent post and advice, particularly the BATNA. I made that suggestion on Chris’s post yesterday and got some pushback (see http://bit.ly/dedym5). I worked with some outstanding i-bankers doing major M&amp;A transactions in New York who were masters at keeping potential acquirors warm and exclusivity periods short (sometimes 15 days); obviously, it’s a little trickier trying to execute in a Series A round.  

Also, excellent advice from Antony Brydon (in the comments) re: &quot;[having] all due diligence ready to go on demand.&quot; As I noted in #3 in my post re: selling companies (see http://bit.ly/blbX9s), it is &quot;an easy way to instill confidence&quot; and also demonstrates a certain level of credibility and sophistication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nivi &#8212; Excellent post and advice, particularly the BATNA. I made that suggestion on Chris’s post yesterday and got some pushback (see <a href="http://bit.ly/dedym5)" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/dedym5)</a>. I worked with some outstanding i-bankers doing major M&amp;A transactions in New York who were masters at keeping potential acquirors warm and exclusivity periods short (sometimes 15 days); obviously, it’s a little trickier trying to execute in a Series A round.  </p>
<p>Also, excellent advice from Antony Brydon (in the comments) re: &#8220;[having] all due diligence ready to go on demand.&#8221; As I noted in #3 in my post re: selling companies (see <a href="http://bit.ly/blbX9s)" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/blbX9s)</a>, it is &#8220;an easy way to instill confidence&#8221; and also demonstrates a certain level of credibility and sophistication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antony Brydon</title>
		<link>http://venturehacks.com/articles/closing-quickly/comment-page-1#comment-8585</link>
		<dc:creator>Antony Brydon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturehacks.com/?p=1355#comment-8585</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to add a fourth point that I think deserves a spot on the summary list:

      4. Have all due diligence ready to go on demand

Due diligence on demand means that the company&#039;s due diligence is always current, up-to-date, and ready to be delivered to a potential partner, investor or acquiror at a moment&#039;s notice.

Given that financing and acquisitions are rare (once a year), this may seem like overkill. But it actually demands that the company keep its books current and in perfect order, which has a number of other associated and equally important benefits. 

We went from term sheet to close in our Series A with KP in 20  days, and it came at an opportunistic time when we were not actively raising venture.  Part of this was a function of us having good counsel and KP having good counsel, but having diligence &quot;always-on&quot; was a key component.

I wrote a bit more about it here: http://tinyurl.com/ca38wq</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to add a fourth point that I think deserves a spot on the summary list:</p>
<p>      4. Have all due diligence ready to go on demand</p>
<p>Due diligence on demand means that the company&#8217;s due diligence is always current, up-to-date, and ready to be delivered to a potential partner, investor or acquiror at a moment&#8217;s notice.</p>
<p>Given that financing and acquisitions are rare (once a year), this may seem like overkill. But it actually demands that the company keep its books current and in perfect order, which has a number of other associated and equally important benefits. </p>
<p>We went from term sheet to close in our Series A with KP in 20  days, and it came at an opportunistic time when we were not actively raising venture.  Part of this was a function of us having good counsel and KP having good counsel, but having diligence &#8220;always-on&#8221; was a key component.</p>
<p>I wrote a bit more about it here: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/ca38wq" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/ca38wq</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael F. Martin</title>
		<link>http://venturehacks.com/articles/closing-quickly/comment-page-1#comment-8574</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturehacks.com/?p=1355#comment-8574</guid>
		<description>Since it might interest Venture Hacks readers, a very good discussion of BATNA and related theory is provided in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Bargaining-Advantage-Negotiation-Strategies-Reasonable/dp/0140281916&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bargaining for Advantage&lt;/a&gt;.  This  was one of the most useful books I read in law school.  The appendix form questions to consider in preparation for a negotiation are particularly useful in referring back to the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since it might interest Venture Hacks readers, a very good discussion of BATNA and related theory is provided in <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Bargaining-Advantage-Negotiation-Strategies-Reasonable/dp/0140281916" rel="nofollow">Bargaining for Advantage</a>.  This  was one of the most useful books I read in law school.  The appendix form questions to consider in preparation for a negotiation are particularly useful in referring back to the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
