<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Books for Entrepreneurs: Agile Software Development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venturehacks.com/articles/agile-software-development/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venturehacks.com/articles/agile-software-development</link>
	<description>Good advice for startups.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:11:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Haider</title>
		<link>http://venturehacks.com/articles/agile-software-development/comment-page-1#comment-8631</link>
		<dc:creator>Haider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 17:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturehacks.com/?p=481#comment-8631</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the book recommendation.

Agile development should come with a warning: Once you&#039;re exposed to it you might not be able to tolerate other practices.

This is what happened with me.

I became convinced that the agile approach is the way to go when it comes to web development when I applied parts of it to personal projects. So I couldn&#039;t understand how the company I work in could see things differently. 

They&#039;ve already spent over 6 months on documentation and requirements gathering and they are clearly going on an insanely stupid path.

I&#039;m planning on leaving them to start my own company simply because I can&#039;t stand the stupidity people approach web development with. The worst thing I heard in one of the useless and frustrating meetings I attended was: &quot;Who cares about the users, as long as we get approval from the project committee.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the book recommendation.</p>
<p>Agile development should come with a warning: Once you&#8217;re exposed to it you might not be able to tolerate other practices.</p>
<p>This is what happened with me.</p>
<p>I became convinced that the agile approach is the way to go when it comes to web development when I applied parts of it to personal projects. So I couldn&#8217;t understand how the company I work in could see things differently. </p>
<p>They&#8217;ve already spent over 6 months on documentation and requirements gathering and they are clearly going on an insanely stupid path.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m planning on leaving them to start my own company simply because I can&#8217;t stand the stupidity people approach web development with. The worst thing I heard in one of the useless and frustrating meetings I attended was: &#8220;Who cares about the users, as long as we get approval from the project committee.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inflecto Systems Ltd (Software Developers)</title>
		<link>http://venturehacks.com/articles/agile-software-development/comment-page-1#comment-5773</link>
		<dc:creator>Inflecto Systems Ltd (Software Developers)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 11:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturehacks.com/?p=481#comment-5773</guid>
		<description>Nice article. I will be checking the book out. Another book I have been reading recently which I can really recommend is Agile Principles, Patterns, and Practices in C#  by Robert C. Martin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. I will be checking the book out. Another book I have been reading recently which I can really recommend is Agile Principles, Patterns, and Practices in C#  by Robert C. Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Pietri</title>
		<link>http://venturehacks.com/articles/agile-software-development/comment-page-1#comment-5737</link>
		<dc:creator>William Pietri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 19:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venturehacks.com/?p=481#comment-5737</guid>
		<description>Great to see these approaches getting more attention in the startup world. I&#039;ve been soaking in both agile methods and startup companies a long time, and I think they go perfectly together. They provide just enough structure to make everybody effective, without unnecessary constraints or process bloat.

One of my clients, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sidereel.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sidereel.com&lt;/a&gt; started with an XP-ish process from the first week. They had an alpha for investors in 2 months, a private beta in 3, and a public beta in 4 months. Now they&#039;re happily funded, up to a dozen people, and just shy of Alexa 1000 site. Weekly iterations meant they always had new progress to show potential investors. And being able to change direction easily meant they could try a lot of things out and invest heavily in areas the users liked.

Speaking of which, I and a colleague are interested in trying out some variations of the Planning Game with a couple of user-focused startups. If any VH readers want to be guinea pigs, we&#039;re looking for Bay Area teams that are early in the process, actively struggling to put together a product plan, and have both business and technical people involved full time. If there&#039;s anybody here that meets those criteria, just drop me a line. My email address is my first name at my domain name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to see these approaches getting more attention in the startup world. I&#8217;ve been soaking in both agile methods and startup companies a long time, and I think they go perfectly together. They provide just enough structure to make everybody effective, without unnecessary constraints or process bloat.</p>
<p>One of my clients, <a href="http://www.sidereel.com/" rel="nofollow">sidereel.com</a> started with an XP-ish process from the first week. They had an alpha for investors in 2 months, a private beta in 3, and a public beta in 4 months. Now they&#8217;re happily funded, up to a dozen people, and just shy of Alexa 1000 site. Weekly iterations meant they always had new progress to show potential investors. And being able to change direction easily meant they could try a lot of things out and invest heavily in areas the users liked.</p>
<p>Speaking of which, I and a colleague are interested in trying out some variations of the Planning Game with a couple of user-focused startups. If any VH readers want to be guinea pigs, we&#8217;re looking for Bay Area teams that are early in the process, actively struggling to put together a product plan, and have both business and technical people involved full time. If there&#8217;s anybody here that meets those criteria, just drop me a line. My email address is my first name at my domain name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
